(If you don't know who Aaron Krickstein is, this story loses a lot of its juice.)
He went on to have many great successes, but his most famous match came in 1991 when he played in what has been called the most re-watched match in history. Connors v. Krickstein was the go-to clip for broadcasters when there was a rain delay at the US Open. Every time the heavens opened there was Aaron losing to a 39-year old rejuvenated Connors.
Granader v. Krickstein was seen by few and remembered by one, and it's been replayed many times - in my head.
I don't recall the exact date, but I know we were so young our moms had to drive us and they sat courtside chatting. Aaron was the number one seed. I was his first round victim. The match took 35 minutes.
We never saw each other again.
Why would we?
The following year Aaron upset 15th-seeded Vitas Gerulaitis, in the third round of the US Open, while I was cruising my Cutlas Supreme to High School. When he was losing to Connors, I was finishing up law school.
The years passed, I followed his career, his wins, his injuries, a car crash that set him back.
I was rooting for him, because he was a part of my history whether he knew it or not. The more famous he became, the better my story got.
So when I overheard a friend at a dinner party mention Aaron Krickstein, I jumped. He is a tennis pro near where we live in Florida. "I play with him twice a week, why don’t you come by,” she offered.
And so I did.
I know they say don't meet your heroes, because they disappoint. But he is not my hero, he is simply part of my hero's journey.
Walking up to meet him I was conscious not to jump into my stupid story about our unremarkable match. But my friend said, "this is kind of a rematch."
"Have we played?" he asked without looking up, he was putting a grip on a racquet.
Well, that was my cue and I told my tale. With a smile he asked, "who won?" But he knew, since he still owns the record for the longest winning streak in Michigan tennis history and probably remembers his few losses.
It was a moment, not a rematch.
Our match 43 years ago was for me, a peak athletic achievement. To him it was less than meaningless, it was embarrassing, his mother had said. He was on a path to go pro but needed to play in these local tournaments to keep his eligibility. Why would he want to play 15 year-olds when he was already the 15 and 18-and-under Champ?
And so as these two 58-year old men batted a ball from opposite sides of the net I couldn't help but think how far apart we were. My mind was racing that I can't believe I'm hitting with this guy again. And he must have been thinking: "What's for lunch?"
I was another tennis lesson on another Tuesday morning, like a thousand Tuesdays he’s experienced in the last 30 years of teaching.
Why does this matter to me? Why would I tell people about a tennis match I lost 40 years ago?Is it simply a way of informing some unlucky listener that in the reflected glory of Aaron's run, I was once a player too?
And what did I want from this second meeting?
His success gave me the greatest gift: A lifelong memory and a story to tell. And I wanted to give him something in return, but I had nothing he wanted. He did the hard work and I was the lucky beneficiary. Maybe I just wanted him to know that.